Anti-bullying week

As this week is Anti-bullying week, I feel it necessary to highlight the impact that bullying can have on both the agonist and the antagonist. Rigby, K et al’s. (2004) below summary highlights this well: 

A brief historical background – 

Over the last two decades, bullying in schools has become an issue of widespread concern (Smith, Morita, Junger-Tas, Olweus, Catalano and Slee, 1999). This is not to say that in earlier times bullying in schools was ignored. There was much animated public discussion of bullying in English private schools in the mid-nineteenth century following the publication of the famous novel Tom Brown's school days (Hughes, 1857). This book evoked strong expressions of abhorrence towards, and condemnation of, the practice of bullying, and various suggestions were made on how it could be countered (see Rigby, 1997). However, the systematic examination of the nature and prevalence of school bullying only began with the work of Olweus in the 1970 in Scandinavia.

The volume of research since then has clarified much about the nature of bullying, and the suffering it can cause (see Rigby, 2002; Smith, 2004). Certain pupils are clearly more at risk of being involved as bullies or victims, or sometimes both (bully/victims), by virtue of personality, family background factors, characteristics such as disability, and the nature and quality of friendships and peer-group reputation. Also, there is considerable evidence that the experience of being a victim can exacerbate outcomes such as low self-esteem, anxiety, depression, mistrust of others, psychosomatic symptoms, and school refusal (Hawker and Boulton, 2000). In addition, a career as a bully in school predicts increased risks of violence and abuse in later life.
 
As mentioned in my previous blog there is a need to take a holistic approach to education developing the child as a whole. Developing character and resilience may just play its part in supporting both the bully and those being bullied. 
 
Rigby, K., Smith, P., & Pepler, D. (2004). Working to prevent school bullying: Key issues. In P. Smith, D. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be? (pp. 1-12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511584466.002

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Working with the Institute of Voluntary Action Research (IVAR) –  As we are nearing our first year of the Foundation, I wanted to reflect on how it's going. Early in the year I worked with IVAR as part of a focus group discussing the merits and pitfalls of small social enterprises and Community Interest Companies.  Please see the below blog entitled ‘Like a Charity but Different’, the blog explores the challenges that many CIC leaders face, including: Lack of distinct spaces to connect; Competing priorities, responsibilities and succession planning; Funder perceptions.  'Like a charity but different’: CIC leaders share their experiences As part of our Leading in Uncertainty work, we held a series of peer sessions for Community Interest Company (CIC) leaders in the Community First Yorkshire network. CICs are a special type of limited company that exists to benefit the community rather than private shareholders [1]  and are part of the voluntary sector. ...
Read more

Success v's Success: Rich v's Rich

Comparison with other countries on the narrow set of subjects that PISA (and the UK education system) focuses on (Mathematics, Science and Literacy) (OECD.org 2020), is not the correct way to gain a full picture of how successful countries are. This area of analysis and comparison only looks at pupils’ attainment, and in a small range of subjects which highlights ‘success’ from a neoliberal perspective. Alternatively, it could be more appropriate to measure student ‘success’ holistically based on criteria such as happiness, well-being, and mental health, perhaps under the umbrella of social development. For example, analysis using World Bank figures show that the five countries with the largest economies (Howmuch.net, 2018) do not score highly on the World Happiness Report (Helliwell et al, 2020), nor do they score highly in the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Well-being of Children Report Card 13 (2016). In both tables (focusing on Social Development based criteria) the leadin...
Read more